🎁 12 Days of Sustainability is live! Sign up to our mailing list for daily exclusive offers and resources straight to your inbox.
0
0

Corporate greenwashing anxiety risks derailing net zero progress

corporate greenwashing

A new corporate sustainability survey of 200 chief sustainability officers (CSOs) and senior decision-makers reveals that corporate greenwashing fears are stalling meaningful investment in nature-based climate solutions. Commissioned by Earthly, the study found that over half (51 percent) of respondents cite integrity and reputational risk as the biggest barrier to investing in carbon and biodiversity projects. 

Worryingly, nearly one in four (23 percent) say they fear accusations of greenwashing more than the consequences of not acting at all. Keep reading as we delve deeper into the findings and the growing paralysis among businesses keen to meet climate and nature targets, but unsure of which projects they can trust. 

Nature-based solutions face scrutiny and rejection

This hesitation is not without cause. Earthly’s analysis of 1,000 nature restoration projects over the past five years revealed that 92 percent failed to meet baseline quality standards across three pillars: carbon integrity, biodiversity outcomes, and social safeguards. Many fell short on essential elements such as evidence of additionality, protection of indigenous rights, and measurable water quality improvements.

For CSOs under growing internal pressure to act, 14 percent said they struggle to justify nature-based claims even within their own organisations. In this climate of increased accountability, the fear of being accused of corporate greenwashing is real and rising. This lack of verifiable, science-based project data creates a serious roadblock. Corporate risk appetites are narrowing, and vague environmental claims no longer pass stakeholder scrutiny.

Reduce reputational risk through accredited sustainability training

Why businesses need defensible sustainability evidence

The business case for investment in nature remains strong, from value chain resilience to regulatory readiness. However, the risk of reputational damage from corporate greenwashing is proving too great in the absence of trusted verification mechanisms. Earthly’s CEO, Oliver Bolton, summarised the dilemma well: “Ambition isn’t the issue – confidence is. Leaders want to invest in nature, but they need defensible evidence they can stand behind.”

To address this credibility gap, Earthly launched Keystone 3.0, a new independent assessment framework that evaluates projects using 160+ data points across carbon, biodiversity, and people. Projects that fail to meet these rigorous thresholds are excluded, raising the bar for transparency and effectiveness in the voluntary carbon market.

For organisations serious about integrating nature into their ESG strategies, this data marks a critical turning point. Sustainability leaders must now prioritise project due diligence and evidence-based decision-making, especially when working with external partners. In parallel, they need to align their internal communications and governance to support cautious, but not paralysed, climate action.

Critically, corporate greenwashing is no longer just a marketing misstep – it’s a strategic liability. Boards and investors are asking harder questions, and CSOs need robust, independent assessments to justify every initiative.

Final thoughts – Restoring confidence, driving action

The path forward lies in restoring trust in climate and nature-based investments through standardised frameworks, third-party verification, and transparency. Initiatives like Keystone 3.0 represent a step in the right direction, but broader industry collaboration is essential.

At ISS, we continue to support professionals with the corporate sustainability training they need to confidently navigate this evolving risk landscape. Our practical, expert-led education equips leaders to separate credible action from empty corporate greenwashing claims, and to take bold, informed steps that meet public, regulatory, and investor expectations.

+ posts

Dedicated to harnessing the power of storytelling to raise awareness, demystify, and drive behavioural change, Bronagh works as the Communications & Content Manager at the Institute of Sustainability Studies. Alongside her work with ISS, Bronagh contributes articles to several news media publications on sustainability and mental health.

Share via:

Latest Insights

ISO 14064

What is ISO 14064?

What is ISO 14064? A clear guide to ISO 14064 greenhouse gas accounting, verification and why it matters for credible carbon reporting.

Build sustainability literacy across your organisation

We’ve helped companies like AmazonEncirc, and HubSpot build internal capability through training that:

0